Effective Backlog Management – Backlog Size Control

Backlog management has a number of different but, interdependent focuses: Backlog Work Order Quality, Age of Backlog and Backlog Size Management. This article will focus on Backlog Size Management. In parts 2 and 3, the Age of the Backlog and Backlog Size Management were discussed in detail.


During the 1960s many major companies reduced crew size by laying off junior workers, rolling maintenance employees to operations roles or temoprarilly laying them off. It was understood during that period, that a newly hired employee could expect several temporary layoffs until they gained enough seniority to be above the layoff threshold. Major companies realized the shortsightedness of this practice in the mid seventies, and began using other means of adjusting the crew size when business was slow. 


Steve Giles, Marshall Institute


A common approach during the mid-1970s was to staff at a 60-80% level and maintain a supplement contract work force to meet the requirements during high demand periods.

I experienced this new approach in the early eighties when the plant where I was assigned encountered an extended slow business period. The company reacted first by displacing all contractors with their employees – security, janitorial, and supplemental maintenance. As the slow period became extended, mechanics and operators were loaned to local community service programmes, such as Habitat for Humanity. For several months, I had mechanics building affordable housing while being fully paid by the company. Needless to say, the morale and loyalty of the employees grew tremendously. The company also gained from reducing turnover and training costs.

Reactive organizations will have very large backlogs (documented and/or undocumented).  This may be interpreted as an indicator of understaffing. In reality, adding resources will not have a substantial impact on the backlog size without fundamental changes in how maintenance tasks are addressed and the quality of the overall maintenance programme. 

The nature of a reactive maintenance programme will keep the focus on the emergencies of the day, causing less urgent work to be ignored until it becomes one of the next day’s emergencies.  With this firefighting mentality, short cuts and Band-Aid maintenance techniques become the norm, guaranteeing more emergencies and shorter life cycles. This cycle will continue until a strong effort to implement a proactive work management process is taken.


High level metric of staffing levels

Organizations with a proactive programme and a well-implemented work management process can use backlog size as a high level metric of its staffing levels (overall and individual craft mix) and the quality of its Planning and Scheduling process. 

This is not a metric that triggers rapid action, but should cause a thorough investigation to determine the root cause. World Class maintenance programmes have a 5-week backlog target by craft and crew with a 3 to 7 week upper and lower control limit. This should be monitored on a monthly basis, but only trigger an investigation if a trend is established over a number of months. Once a trend is recognized, an objective investigation should be undertaken to determine why the trend is occurring. There are normal activities that could cause a temporary trend in the backlog level.  For example a major plant outage or turnaround can push the backlog higher when many routine tasks have to be delayed. 

Reaction to the trends can result in cleaning the backlog (see Part 1 of this article in Maintworld 3/2017) or reducing/increasing the contract crew size to bring the backlog within the control limits. Today, many companies use supplemental maintenance as a relief valve during difficult business periods.

Some companies take a long term view, allowing reduced replacement of attrition to lower the crew size to match the workload. In cases of a high backlog, both increasing overtime and bringing on more contractors are commonly used tools.

A note of caution if you allow your supplemental contractors to maintain their own backlog: any decisions to reduce or increase crew size must be done only after a thorough review of the quality of the work orders in backlog.  

I experienced the need to take this step a number of years ago. The supplemental maintenance contractor manager requested increasing the number of his staff due to a high backlog. His request was at first considered and he started the process of hiring more supplemental mechanics. When knowledge of this increase reached the maintenance planners, a number of questions were raised.  A thorough review of each work order revealed many with unreliable estimates, work orders that had already been completed or work orders for tasks that had no business benefits.  The contractor’s backlog was reduced to normal levels and the hiring of additional supplemental mechanics avoided. To ensure this didn’t reoccur, a regular backlog review meeting was established.

Contract firms do use backlog metrics as a means to control job security and profitability for the firm by moving personnel between jobs, if possible, or reducing crew size (layoffs) to match the available work. They will set the backlog targets at an appropriate level for the industry they are serving, normally much higher than the 5-week target of world class companies. Specialty contractors can have much higher backlog targets, especially if there is a limited number of firms specializing in their field.


Establishing a Backlog Metric

 A clear definition of when a work order is placed in backlog should be developed first to ensure an accurate backlog. Some organizations include all work orders, even those without accurate estimates. This adding of work orders with “guesstimates” will make the backlog greatly exaggerated.

To ensure an accurate backlog, only those work orders that have been fully estimated should be included. Work orders that are awaiting planning or being planned should not be added to the backlog.

Any backlog size metric will only be as accurate as the planner's estimates. World class metrics for work order estimate accuracy is =/- 10%. Reactive maintenance organization’s work order estimates will be +/- 50% to many times more.

A separate backlog metric should be kept for each craft and crew (multi shop sites) with control limits to trigger any possible actions.

While the man-hours per craft and crew are what are pulled from the work orders, converting the metric to man-weeks helps make the metric easier to use. 


Typical Backlog metric

This metric should be reviewed on a monthly basis and investigated when a trend of several months is seen.  The first step should be a quality review by those personnel who are familiar with the operations needs and maintenances resources (Operations and Maintenance supervision or managers).  This review will need to look at all the work orders in backlog, not just those that are overdue.  If the quality review doesn’t bring the backlog into control limits, a continuous improvement tool such as a 5 Why analysis can be applied to discover the cause of the out of control backlog.

Possible causes of an out of control backlog are:

  • Work order quality – inaccurate estimates – invalid work orders – completed work  
  • Major turnaround being done with plant maintenance or supplemental maintenance personnel
  • A time-driven capital project being completed with plant maintenance or supplemental maintenance personnel
  • Business slow period – short or long term
  • Crews not correctly sized to the workload
  • Crafts not sized correctly – too few or too many of one craft
  • Inexperienced mechanics 

Corrective steps that could be taken:

  • Clean the backlog
  • Be patient and let time correct the cause (turnaround, project, or a temporary business slowdown)
  • Balance crews across all shops
  • Identify areas of inexperience and provide training 
  • Reduce or increase the supplemental maintenance personnel

Regardless of what the cause is determined to be, any corrective steps should be carefully considered for their long-term effect. Any corrective effort should be discussed with all stakeholders and a consensus reached. 

Asset Management | 28.3.2018

Latest articles

Mining sector to rely increasingly on renewables, report finds

As mining companies become more aware of the rapidly falling costs of renewables, wind and solar are set become a growing trend in powering mining operations worldwide over the coming years, shows a new report from Fitch Solutions. On the back of carbon pricing schemes, countries and companies operating in the Americas are best positioned to lead the way in the adoption of renewables in mining.

HSE | 12.9.2018

Evaluating IT asset management software: Who do you trust?

Nowadays, more or less all companies have to deal with diverse kinds of IT assets. Using IT assets (software, hardware, digital media and networking) is no longer specific to the technology giants. 

Cmms | 7.9.2018

Undeniable proof that you need a reliable IT service desk

Are you still stuck up with the traditional back-office IT service management system, that requires manual logging of issues in an excel document? Is it taking you eons to come up with a report of reliable data you’ve been entrusted with by the business user? Or, do you have too many software applications that automated your ticketing system but added to your woes in the form of too many complications and errors? I

Asset Management | 6.9.2018

New methanol engine ready for the marine market

Within the frame of the GreenPilot project, Gothenburg-based ScandiNAOS AB has developed methanol engine concepts for the marine industry. A spark ignited methanol engine that wasn installed and tested in the Swedish Pilot boat “GreenPilot” has now been followed by a compression ignited methanol engine. The GreenPilot project is lead and initiated by Swedish Maritime Technology Forum, part of RISE Research Institutes of Sweden.

R&D | 4.9.2018

Wärtsilä Ballast Water Management Systems successfully tested for global compliance

Technology group Wärtsilä has announced that its Aquarius UV Ballast Water Management System (BWMS) has successfully completed all testing procedures required for United States Coastguard (USCG) type approval compliance. The documentation for full USCG type approval is being finalised for submission and awaits only final input from DNV-GL, the USCG approved independent laboratory.

Applications | 25.7.2018

How to Safely Align Wind Turbines

Safety engineers around the world can breathe easy. The PRUFTECHNIK ROTALIGN® and OPTALIGN® technology has made aligning machine shafts, especially gear shafts, much safer.

Partner Articles | 6.6.2018

Maintenance: A Necessary and Important Function in the Future

Euromaintenance 2016 will take place in Athens at the end of May. It is the ideal moment to reflect on maintenance in a European context. Euromaintenance is known as the summit for all involved in maintenance across Europe, it’s the place to be. The conference, with the support of the EFNMS, is the only commercially independent conference covering the topics we deal with in the maintenance world.

EFNMS | 20.5.2016