Do you have all the answers? Maybe you should look for help from within

Who leads the reliability (and performance) improvement initiative in your facility? Who determines which improvement projects should be implemented? Who executes the projects? Who performs the root cause analysis? If the answer is “me”, or “my reliability team”, then we may have found the person who is holding back the success of your programme!

Click Image to Enlarge
Iceberg

Now, just possibly, you may be upset with me right now. Keep reading and I hope to change your opinion. But before I do, I would like to ask you a few more questions.

Who in your plant knows the most about the problems that occur: the slow-downs, minor-stoppages, equipment failures, the waste, the inefficiencies, the source of poor quality, the frustrations due to maintenance work not being executed correctly, and so on? Is it you? Is it senior leadership? Is it anyone in management or engineering?

What about the maintenance technicians and operators? Aren’t they the people who face these issues every day? Don’t they see it all first hand? And I wonder how many times they have thought of solutions to those problems, but no one has listened to them – and no one has asked their opinion.

There is a classic graphic known as the “iceberg of ignorance” that illustrates the level of knowledge and awareness that is common in most plants. Where are you on this graphic?

So, if you agree that the people working closest to the equipment know the most about those problems, what would you think about getting them involved in the solution? Now, what just went through your mind? “How would they know how to solve the problems?” “I could not trust them to make improvements.” “Some of those guys thrive on fixing the problems (hero status, overtime pay, etc.), they don’t want to eliminate them.” “Those guys cause the problems, they won’t fix them.” “It is not in their job description to make improvements.”

Maybe there are other thoughts going through your mind, but if they are anything like those listed above, then unfortunately you are selling them all short.

Pay respect, show trust, and ask for help

OK, more questions. What do you think those people do at night and at the weekends? Are they capable people who solve problems, build stuff, fix other stuff, help in the community, and so on? OK, they may not have degrees and they may not be qualified reliability engineers, but most of the problems that need to be solved do not require rocket scientists. Just as you probably hate it when your manager/supervisor sells you short and is unwilling to give you responsibility, they feel the same way.

It is time to pay them respect, show some trust, and go and ask for help. There are lots of ways that you can execute this process, but you need to provide a means to ask for ideas and suggestions, put a value on those ideas, and ask their help in executing the solutions.

Yes, don’t just ask for their suggestion, let them take ownership and execute the improvement plan. Put yourself in their shoes.
Option 1 is to ignore them. They will be frustrated and annoyed – and thus you have the current situation.

Option 2 is to require them to change their practices according to your directives. And there will not be many of those requests because there are only so many projects you can manage. They have zero ownership, and again they are frustrated at not being consulted.

Option 3 is to ask their opinion (much better for morale), but you take control and then implement the changes. Again, this will be a slow process as you only have so much time.

And Option 4 is to ask their help, (financially justify the ideas if necessary), and then get out of their way and let them take ownership. Wow, how would they feel? They are being trusted and respected. They will be proud of the changes they have implemented. They will see the benefits of their actions. And the initiative will take off when others see the results of these projects, and witness the thanks and praise you heap on them when the projects are executed (don’t forget to do that). Just think about how many improvements can be made when everyone is involved!

Will they execute those projects the same ways as you would have? Maybe. Maybe not. They may do a better job as they know more about the problem and have more to gain. But if they happen to make mistakes, learn from them and move on. Improve, don’t punish.

This isn’t anything new. It is at the heart of TPS and Lean (depending whose book you read). Performing root cause analysis, making suggestions, and executing the solution is fundamental to how humans work. You need to show some trust and let nature take its course.

 

Jason Tranter 

Tranter_Jason_Mobius

CMRP,
Mobius Institute

Asset Management | 14.3.2019

Latest articles

Collaboration Between Gasum and Tampere Regional Solid Waste Management to Boost the Use of Biogas in Transport

Gasum and Tampere Regional Solid Waste Management have signed an agreement under which biogas produced at a new biogas plant constructed in Koukkujärvi, Nokia, Finland, will be sold to Gasum. The deal strengthens the use of biogas in transport and is a good example of regional circular economy.

HSE | 12.4.2019

Dispelling the Legends of Maintenance Management

There are many legends surrounding maintenance management in plants. Often, the legends aren’t true, but people live with them because it is simply convenient or so ingrained that they don’t even realize it’s a legend. Plants must break the legends that exist in their organizations to gain improvements in equipment reliability and maintenance management. Some of the legends will be addressed in this article. You might become uncomfortable when you realize some of the legends are embedded in your organization.

Asset Management | 27.3.2019

Implementing RCM? 5 Mistakes You Need to Avoid

If you are considering to employ  RCM analysis  at your facility, it means you have recognized the need for a change in your maintenance strategies. Reliability-centered maintenance is an excellent way to keep your plant or machinery up and running by helping you choose the optimal maintenance strategy for all of your important assets. 

Cmms | 19.3.2019

Wärtsilä successfully tests remote guidance service capabilities

Technology group Wärtsilä has successfully tested its remote guidance service, thereby creating an entirely new dimension in vessel repair and maintenance operations.

Applications | 15.3.2019

Save Energy in Steam and Condensate Systems

The oldest paper mill still operating in Germany detects defective steam traps with digital ultrasonic testing technology

Partner Articles | 15.3.2019

Time to Invest in Europe’s Water Infrastructure

THE WATER AND SANITATION sector is an important part of the European economy. It represents more than 500,000 people directly employed in water and sewerage companies, operating thousands of facilities and several million kilometres of networks.

Editorial | 14.3.2019

Digital Line of Sight

Will a Digital Twin Become a Key Element of Your Digitalization Strategy to Reduce Risk and Enable Operational Excellence?

R&D | 14.3.2019

Maintenance: A Necessary and Important Function in the Future

Euromaintenance 2016 will take place in Athens at the end of May. It is the ideal moment to reflect on maintenance in a European context. Euromaintenance is known as the summit for all involved in maintenance across Europe, it’s the place to be. The conference, with the support of the EFNMS, is the only commercially independent conference covering the topics we deal with in the maintenance world.

EFNMS | 20.5.2016